Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Changing Attitudes toward Youth Violence: The Role of Brief Hospital-based Interventions

Michel B Aboutanos, Salpi Kevorkian, Kelly E O Connor, Rachelle Hunley, Robin Foster, Sheryl Garland, Nicholas Thomson

Keywords : Brief violence intervention, Case management, Youth violence

Citation Information : Aboutanos MB, Kevorkian S, O Connor KE, Hunley R, Foster R, Garland S, Thomson N. Changing Attitudes toward Youth Violence: The Role of Brief Hospital-based Interventions. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2024; 13 (1):14-20.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1443

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-04-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aims and background: The epidemic of youth violence is sweeping the nation and has become a public health crisis. The impact of hospital-based interventions on risk (violent attitudes and behaviors) and protective factors [attitudes toward school (ATS) and attitudes toward employment (ATE)] remains unknown. This study will assess changes in attitudes toward violence (ATV) in response to a hospital-based brief violence intervention (BVI) and community case management services (CCMS). Materials and methods: Youths (10–24 years) who were intentionally injured and admitted to a level 1 trauma center were prospectively randomly assigned to BVI alone (group I) or in combination with BVI + CCMS (group II). Recidivism, ATV, triggers for fighting (TFF), ATS, ATE, and future aspirations (FAs) were assessed at baseline (BsL) during admission, 6 weeks (6W), and 6 months (6M) postdischarge. Results: A total of 75 injured patients were enrolled. The groups did not significantly differ in demographics or injuries. Around 21% of the participants reported having a history of violent recidivism. ATS improved from 64% BsL to 81% 6W (p = 0.14) and 92% 6M (p = 0.07). ATV improved from 68% BsL to 79% at 6W (p = 0.0061) and (78%) at 6M (p = 0.0199). TFF was transiently decreased (<50%) at 6W, returning back to BsL (>50%) at 6M. ATE was high, >90% at all levels. The hospital experience was associated with a positive change in future outlook and aspirations in 70 to 80% (group I 75% and group II 78%) at all time periods. Conclusion and clinical significance: Hospital BVI has a positive impact on youths’ perception of and vulnerability to violence while promoting protective factors.


HTML PDF Share
  1. David-Ferdon C, Vivolo-Kantor AM, Dahlberg LL, et al. A comprehensive technical package for the prevention of youth violence and associated risk behaviors. Atlanta, Georgia: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention; 2016.
  2. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997;277(5328):918–924. DOI: 10.1126/science.277.5328.918
  3. Dowd MD. Consequence of violence: premature death, violence recidivism, and violent criminality. Pediatr Clin North Am 1998;45(2):333–340. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70009-2
  4. Cunningham R, Knox L, Fein J, et al. Before and after the trauma bay: the prevention of violent injury among youth. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53(4):490–500. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.11.014
  5. Shibru D, Zahnd E, Becker M, et al. Benefits of a hospital–based peer intervention program for violently injured youth. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205(5):684–689. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.029
  6. Goins WA, Thompson J, Simpkins C. Recurrent intentional injury. J Natl Med Assoc 1992;84(5):431–435.
  7. Aboutanos MB, Jordan A, Goldberg S, et al. Bridging the gap: hospital community–based youth violence prevention program–pitfalls and lessons learned. Curr Trauma Rep 2017;3(2):79–88. DOI: 10.1007/s40719-017-0084-0
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Violence: Facts at a Glance. Atlanta, GA; 2016.
  9. Masho SW, Schoeny ME, Webster D, et al. Outcomes, data, and indicators of violence at the community level. J Prim Prevent 2016;37:121–139. DOI: 10.1007/s10935-016-0429-4
  10. Aboutanos MB, Jordan A, Cohen R, et al. Brief violence interventions with community case management services are effective for high–risk trauma patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2011;71(1):228–237. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821e0c86
  11. Winters NC, Metz WP. The wraparound approach in systems of care. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2009;32(1):135–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2008.11.007
  12. Ketterlinus R. Interventions for Health Care Providers. Washington, DC: APHA 2008.
  13. Dahlberg LL, Toal SB, Swahn MH, et al. Measuring Violence-Related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Influences among Youths: A Compendium of Assessment Tools. Second Edition. Centers Dis Control Prev. Accessed September 4, 2005.
  14. Johnson CD, Messe LA, Crano WD. Predicting job performance of low income workers: the work opinion questionnaire. Pers Psychol 1984;37(2):291–299. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb01451.x
  15. Simpson DD, McBride AA. Family, Friends, and Self (FFS) assessment scales for Mexican American youth. Hisp J Behav Sci 1992;14(3):327–340. DOI: 10.1177/07399863920143003
  16. Miller-Johnson S, Sullivan TN, Simon TR, et al. Evaluating the impact of interventions in the multisite violence prevention study: samples, procedures, and measures. Am J Prev Med 2004;26(1 Suppl):48–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.015
  17. Brener ND, Kann L, McManus T, et al. Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire. J Adolesc Health 2002;31(4):336–342. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00339-7
  18. Gorman-Smith D, Tolan PH, Zelli A, et al. The relation of family functioning to violence among inner–city minority youths. J Fam Psychol 1996;10(2):115–129. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.10.2.115
  19. Koren PE, DeChillo N, Friesen BJ. Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: a brief questionnaire. Rehabil Psychol 1992;37(4):305–321. DOI: 10.1037/h0079106
  20. Dunst CJ, Leet HE. Measuring the adequacy of resources in households with young children. Child Care Health Dev 1987;13(2):111–125. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1987.tb00528.x
  21. Kabacoff RI, Miller IW, Bishop DS, et al. A psychometric study of the McMaster family assessment device in psychiatric, medical, and nonclinical samples. J Fam Psychol 1990;3(4):431–439. DOI: 10.1037/h0080547
  22. Williams S, Brown A, Patton R, et al. The half–life of the ‘teachable moment’ for alcohol misusing patients in the emergency department. Drug Alcohol Depend 2005;77(2):205–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.07.011
  23. Johnson SB, Bradshaw CP, Wright JL, et al. Characterizing the teachable moment. Pediatr Emerg Care 2007;23(8):553–559. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31812c6687
  24. Monti PM, Colby SM, Barnett NP, et al. Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol–positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. J Consult Clin Psychol 1999;67(6):989–994. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.67.6.989
  25. Becker B, Woolard R, Nirenberg TD, et al. Alcohol use among subcritically injured emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2(9):784–790. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1995.tb03272.x
  26. Richmond TS, Schwab CW, Riely J, et al. Effective trauma center partnerships to address firearm injury: a new paradigm. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2004;56(6):1197–1205. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000130760.87714.0e
  27. Meyer AL, Cohen R, Edmonds T, et al. Developing a comprehensive approach to youth violence prevention in a small city. Am J Prev Med 2008;34(3):S13–S20. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.12.006
  28. Griffith DM, Allen JO, Zimmerman MA, et al. Organizational empowerment in community mobilization to address youth violence. Am J Prev Med 2008;34(3):S89–S99. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.12.015
  29. Bruns EJ, Suter JC, Force MM, et al. Adherence to Wraparound principles and association with outcomes. J Child Fam Stud 2005;14(4):521–534. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-005-7186-y
  30. Cheng TL, Schwarz D, Brenner RA, et al. Adolescent assault injury: risk and protective factors and locations of contact for intervention. Pediatrics 2003;112(4):931–938. DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.4.931
  31. De Vos E, Stone DA, Goetz MA, et al. Evaluation of a hospital-based youth violence intervention. Am J Prev Med 2006;12(5 Suppl):101–108. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30242-3
  32. Rebecca C, Maureen W, Marc Z, et al. SafERTeens: computerized screening and brief intervention for teens at-risk for youth violence. Acad Emerg Med 2007;14(Suppl 1):S106–S107. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.03.996
  33. Becker MG, Hall JS, Ursic CM, et al. Caught in the Crossfire: the effects of a peer–based intervention program for violently injured youth. J Adolesc Health 2004;34(3):177–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.04.001
  34. Zun LS, Downey L, Rosen J. The effectiveness of an ED–based violence prevention program. Am J Emerg Med 2006;24(1):8–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.05.009
  35. Cooper C, Eslinger DM, Stolley PD. Hospital–based violence intervention programs work. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2006;61(3):534–540. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000236576.81860.8c
  36. Cheng TL, Wright JL, Markakis D, et al. Randomized trial of a case management program for assault–injured youth. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008;24(3):130–136. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181666f72
  37. Marcelle DR, Melzer-Lange MD. Project UJIMA: working together to make things right. WMJ 2001;100(2):22–25.
  38. Zun LS, Downey LV, Rosen J. Violence prevention in the ED: linkage of the ED to a social service agency. Am J Emerg Med 2003;21(6):454–457. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-6757(03)00102-5
  39. Dicker RA, Jaeger S, Knudson MM, et al. Where do we go from here? Interim analysis to forge ahead in violence prevention. J Trauma 67(6):1169–1175. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bdb78a
  40. Redding CA, Redding CA, Rossi JS, et al. Health behavior models. Int Electron J Health Educ 2000;3:180–193.
  41. Thomson ND. Routledge International Handbook of Psychopathy and Crime. London: Routledge; 2018. pp. 508–525.
  42. Youth Violence: A Report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD. accessed January 20 2001.
  43. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Repeat injuries in an inner-city population: Philadelphia, 1987–1988. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1990;39(1):1–3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.