Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( September-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Minimal Leak Test vs Manometry for Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Monitoring: A Pilot Study

Alison A Smith, Monica L Farrulla, Sara Al-Dahir, Terry Forrette, John Hunt, Patrick Greiffenstein, Alan Marr, Jennifer Mooney

Keywords : Critical care, Intubation, Monitoring

Citation Information : Smith AA, Farrulla ML, Al-Dahir S, Forrette T, Hunt J, Greiffenstein P, Marr A, Mooney J. Minimal Leak Test vs Manometry for Endotracheal Cuff Pressure Monitoring: A Pilot Study. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2019; 8 (3):139-142.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1252

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: Optimal cuff pressure for intubated patients is 20–30 cm H2O as routinely measured by manometry. This methodology is associated with elevated costs due to equipment requirements. The objective of this study was to evaluate another methodology, i.e., the minimal leak testing (MLT). Materials and methods: Initial cuff pressures were measured by manometry for all mechanically ventilated patients in a surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Two critical care physicians separately performed an MLT for each subject and cuff pressure was then remeasured by manometry. The rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was determined. Results: Thirty subjects with 100 patient events were evaluated. The post-MLT measured cuff pressures were highly consistent between physicians, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.770 (p = 0.01). Average initial cuff pressures were not significantly different between manometry and MLT (25 cm H2O vs 14 cm H2O, p = 0.1894). Manometry had a higher incidence of elevated cuff pressures (n = 13/50 vs 2/100, p < 0.0001), while MLT had higher incidences low cuff pressures (n = 72/100 vs 17/50, p < 0.0001). No difference was observed in the VAP rate (2.8 vs 3.0 per 1,000 ventilator days, p = 0.96). Conclusion: Minimal leak testing is a known method of cuff pressure monitoring that was demonstrated in this study to provide a reproducible technique.


PDF Share
  1. Grant T. Do current methods for endotracheal tube cuff inflation create pressures above the recommended range? J Perioper Pract 2013;23(12):292–295. DOI: 10.1177/175045891302301205.
  2. Bolzan D, Guizilini S, Faresin S, et al. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure assessment maneuver induces drop of expired tidal volume in the postoperative of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiothorac Surg 2012;7:53. DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-53.
  3. Bernhard W, Cottrell J, Sivakumaran C, et al. Adjustment of intracuff pressure to prevent aspiration. Anesthesiology 1979;50(4):363–366. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197904000-00018.
  4. Tobin MJ, Grenvik A. Nosocomial lung infection and its diagnosis. Crit Care Med 1984;12(3):191–199. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198403000-00008.
  5. Guyton D. Endotracheal and tracheotomy tube cuff design: influence on tracheal damage. Crit Care Update 1990;1:1–10.
  6. Stewart S, Secrest J, Norwood B, et al. A comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures using estimation techniques and direct intracuff measurement. AANA J 2003;71(6):443–447.
  7. Kalil A, Metersky M, Klompas M, et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63(5):e61–e111. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw353.
  8. Rello J, Sonora R, Jubert P, et al. Pneumonia in Intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154(1): 111–115. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680665.
  9. MacKenzie C, Klose S, Browne D. A study of inflatable cuffs on endotracheal tubes. Pressures exerted on the trachea. Br J Anaesth 1976;48(2):105–110. DOI: 10.1093/bja/48.2.105.
  10. Black A, Seegobin R. Pressures on endotracheal tube cuffs. Anaesthesia 1981;36(5):498–511. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb10286.x.
  11. Seegobin R, van Hasselt G. Endotracheal cuff pressure and tracheal mucosal blood flow: endoscopic study effects of four large volume cuffs. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;288(6422):965–968. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.288.6422.965.
  12. Cooper J, Grillo H. Evolution of tracheal injury due to ventilator assistance through cuffed tubes: a pathological study. Ann Surg 1969;169(3):334–348. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-196903000-00007.
  13. Hilding A. Laryngotracheal damage during intratracheal anesthesia. Demonstration by staining the unfixed specimen with methylene blue. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1971;80(4):565–581. DOI: 10.1177/000348947108000420.
  14. Mehta S, Mickiewicz M. Pressure in large volume, low pressure cuffs: its significance, measurement and regulation. Intensive Care Med 1985;11(5):267–272. DOI: 10.1007/BF00260364.
  15. King K, Mandava B, Kamen J. Tracheal tube cuffs and tracheal dilatation. Chest 1975;67(4):458–462. DOI: 10.1378/chest.67.4.458.
  16. Rose L, Redl L. Survey of cuff management practices in intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. Am J Crit Care 2008;17(5):428–435.
  17. Crimlisk J, Horn M, Wilson D, et al. Artificial airways: a survey of cuff management practices. Heart Lung 1996;25(3):225–235. DOI: 10.1016/S0147-9563(96)80033-1.
  18. Harvie D, Darvall J, Dodd M, et al. The minimal leak test technique for endotracheal cuff maintenance. Anaesth Intensive Care 2016;44(5):599–604. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1604400512.
  19. Das S, Kumar P. Comparison of minimal leak test and manual cuff pressure measurement technique method for inflating the endotracheal tube cuff. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2015;2:78–81. DOI: 10.5958/2394-4994.2015.00002.5.
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ventilator-Associated pneumonia, 2002, https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/slides/VAP-DA_gcm.pdf.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.