Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Language and Trauma: Is Care Equivalent for Those Who do not Speak English?

Meghan Garstka, Alison Smith, Tyler Zeoli, Peter S Julnes, Chrissy Guidry, Patrick McGrew, Clifton McGinness, Douglas Slakey, Juan Duchesne, Rebecca Schroll

Keywords : Disparities, Language, Retrospective study

Citation Information : Garstka M, Smith A, Zeoli T, Julnes PS, Guidry C, McGrew P, McGinness C, Slakey D, Duchesne J, Schroll R. Language and Trauma: Is Care Equivalent for Those Who do not Speak English?. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2020; 9 (1):21-25.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1264

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 25-04-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Aim: Few studies examine the relationship of language and surgical outcomes. Language is not included as a variable in many databases. The aim of this study was to examine the association of language and outcomes in trauma. Materials and methods: A 5-year retrospective review was performed at a level I trauma center. All adult trauma patients with a non-English primary language were matched to an English-speaking cohort by age, gender, injury mechanism, initial Glasgow coma scale (GCS), and injury severity score (ISS). Analysis included an unpaired two-tailed Student's t test for continuous variables and a Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Results: Three hundred ninety-five non-English-speaking patients were identified. There was no difference in mortality, intubation rate, number of ventilator days, average hospital length of stay, readmission rates, or rates of nine complications, even when stratified for high (≥15) vs low (≤14) ISS. Non-English-speaking patients had a shorter average length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (5.4 vs 6.9 days, p = 0.03), were mostly self-pay (236, 59.7% vs 127, 32.2%, p < 0.01), and were more likely to be discharged home (340, 86.1% vs 309, 78.2%, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Despite similar outcomes, non-English-speaking trauma patients left the ICU more quickly, were more likely self-pay, and more likely to be discharged home. Clinical significance: These findings raise concerns about possible disparities in trauma care for non-English speaking patients and highlight the importance of inclusion of language as a variable in patient registries and national databases. Future studies should investigate additional potentially significant socioeconomic factors.

  1. Ryan C. Language Use in the United States: 2011. American Community Survey Reports. Issued August 2013. Accessed 30 October 2018.
  2. Gallagher RA, Porter S, Monuteaux MC, et al. Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department: the impact of language. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013;29(5):579–583. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828e62f4.
  3. Ruttan T, Lawson KA, Piper K, et al. Risk factors associated with emergency department return visits following trauma system discharge. Pediatr Emerg Care 2018;34(3):202–207. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001182.
  4. Qureshi MM, Romesser PB, Jalisi S, et al. The influence of limited english proficiency on outcome in patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2014;97(2):276–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.031.
  5. Bard MR, Goettler CE, Schenarts PJ, et al. Language barrier leads to the unnecessary intubation of trauma patients. Am Surg 2004;70(9):783–786.
  6. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. User Guide for the 2017 ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). Revised October 2018. Accessed 30 October 2018.
  7. Youdelman MK. The medical tongue: U.S. laws and policies on language access. Health Aff 2008;27(2):424–433. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.424.
  8. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health. National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health Care Final Report. March 2001. Accessed 31 October 2018.
  9. Torain MJ, Maragh-Bass AC, Dankwa-Mullen I, et al. Surgical disparities: a comprehensive review and new conceptual framework. J Am Coll Surg 2016;223(2):408–418. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.047.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.