VOLUME 7 , ISSUE 1 ( January-April, 2018 ) > List of Articles
Amelia M Pasley, Natasha Hansraj, Jason D Pasley, Jose J Diaz, Brandon Bruns
Keywords : Infective endocarditis, Splenic abscess, Surgical timing
Citation Information : Pasley AM, Hansraj N, Pasley JD, Diaz JJ, Bruns B. What comes First, the Spleen or the Valve? Management of Splenic Abscess complicating Infective Endocarditis: A Single-center Case Series. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2018; 7 (1):77-81.
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1208
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
Published Online: 01-04-2018
Copyright Statement: Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).
Introduction: Splenic abscess is a rare and highly morbid extracardiac manifestation of infective endocarditis (IE) and has only been described in small case series in the literature. Emergency surgeons are often consulted for splenectomy; however, the optimal timing (before or after valve) of this intervention remains unclear. We hypothesized that definitive valve intervention, prior to splenectomy, would lead to superior patient outcomes. Study design: A retrospective review of patients with IE and splenic abscess from June 2011 to June 2016 was performed at a quaternary referral center in the United States. Demographics, comorbid conditions, echocardiography results, intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital length of stay, operative interventions, splenectomy and valve replacement, and complications were collected. Patients were divided based on operation performed first: spleen first (SF) or valve first (VF). The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes including in-hospital morbidity. Results: Ten patients met criteria for inclusion (8 SF, 2 VF). Median age was 45 years. About 90% were male, 60% were active intravenous drug abusers, and 100% had bacteremia (most commonly Enterococcus), with 50% of the patients having single-valve disease and 50% of the patients multivalvular disease. Total 90% had preserved cardiac function [ejection fraction (EF) > 40%]. All patients had splenic abscess diagnosed on HD 1, with 40% undergoing preoperative angioembolization. There was no difference in mortality between the groups (SF 25% vs VF 0%). There was no difference in the splenectomy portion of the operation, regardless of preoperative angioembolization. Conclusions: Representing the largest modern case series on the topic, a 25% overall 6-month mortality rate was observed; however, there was no difference in the order of operation noted in our population. Splenic abscess in conjunction with IE is a highly mortal combination; therefore, a large-scale multi-institutional approach should be utilized to delineate this population and address the order of operation as well as the role of splenic angioembolization in this subset of patients.
© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.
We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience.
By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.