Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2022 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Accident Mechanisms and Demographic Distribution of Train-related Accidents in the United States

Rodrigo Olvera, Sara S Solano, Antonio Marttos, Daniel D Yeh, Patricia M Byers, Gabriel Ruiz, Shevonne S Satahoo, Enrique Ginzburg, Nicholas Namias, Gerd D Pust

Keywords : Suicide, Trains, Traumatic injuries

Citation Information : Olvera R, Solano SS, Marttos A, Yeh DD, Byers PM, Ruiz G, Satahoo SS, Ginzburg E, Namias N, Pust GD. Accident Mechanisms and Demographic Distribution of Train-related Accidents in the United States. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2022; 11 (2):73-77.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1385

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-08-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction: There is little information in the literature about the most critical demographic patterns on train accidents. We attempt to assess demographic patterns associated with railway injuries in the US. Materials and Methods: Using the 2017 National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), we identified adults who suffered train-related injuries. Data collected included age, sex, ethnicity, restraint devices, prehospital and emergency department (ED) vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), time of response and transportation, prehospital cardiac arrest, mechanism of injury, death in crash and in ED, pregnancy more than 20 weeks when applicable, burn injuries, supplemental oxygen, height, weight, ED discharge disposition, history of alcoholism and drug abuse, need of intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay (LOS) at the ICU and hospital, ventilator use in days, hemorrhage control surgery, blood products received, and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score. For all statistical analyses, a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: We identified 4,545 patients, of whom 68% were male, and the mean age was 37 ± 16.5 years. The racial distribution was 64% White, 19% Black, 12% Hispanic, 11% Hispanic, and 6% others. The most common mechanisms of injury were intentional self-harm by jumping or lying in front of the train (30%), followed by pedestrian struck by train (26%), intentional collision of motor vehicle with train (19%), and accidental motor vehicle collision with train (14%). Compared to females, males had lower GCS 12 vs 12.7 (p = 0.005). Alcohol intoxication was present in 13% of patients who had longer LOS 13.4 vs 10 days (p = 0.001). Drug involvement was present in 19% of patients who had lower GCS 11.9 vs 12.6 (p = 0.001). Overall mortality was 17% and was greater in suicide attempts (19%) and pedestrian struck (35%). Mortality for car occupants injured by train collision vs intentional collision of motor vehicle was 5.9 vs 3.4%. Conclusion: The most frequent train-related injuries are secondary to suicide attempts. The second most common incidents occur on railway crossings with pedestrians and motor vehicle occupants. Further public care research is needed to improve safety measures and public awareness associated with railway crossings.


PDF Share
  1. Kontoghiorghe CN, Graham SM, Rodriguez J, et al. Train related injuries: a descriptive analysis highlighting orthopaedic injuries and management. SICOT J 2021;7:43. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021038
  2. Rautji R, Dogra TD. Rail traffic accidents: a retrospective study. Med Sci Law 2004;44(1):67–70. DOI: 10.1258/rsmmsl.44.1.67
  3. Forsberg R, Björnstig U. One hundred years of railway disasters and recent trends. Prehosp Disaster Med 2011;26(5):367–373. DOI: 10.1017/S1049023X1100639X
  4. Chattar-Cora D, Tutela RR, Daum AN, et al. Experience with railroad injuries at a major urban trauma center serving the United States-Mexico border. J Trauma 2007;62(5):1123–1126. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318031cc85
  5. Mohanty MK, Panigrahi MK, Mohanty S, et al. Death due to traumatic railway injury. Med Sci Law 2007;47(2):156–160. DOI: 10.1258/rsmmsl.47.2.156
  6. Pelletier A. Deaths among railroad trespassers. The role of alcohol in fatal injuries. JAMA 1997;277(13):1064–1066. DOI: 10.1001/jama.277.13.1064
  7. Donnally CJ, Sheu JI, Roth ES, et al. An elevated metrorail as a source of orthopedic injuries and death at a level-I trauma ceter. Iowa Orthop J 2019;39(1):159–164. PMCID: PMC6604534; PMID: 31413689.
  8. Gregor S, Beavan G, Culbert A, et al. Patterns of pre-crash behaviour in railway suicides and the effect of corridor fencing: a natural experiment in New South Wales. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2019;26(4):423–430. DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2019.1660376
  9. Schneble CA, Raymond J, Loder RT. The demographics of non-motor vehicle associated railway injuries seen at trauma centers in the United States 2007–2014. Cureus 2019;11(10):e5974. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5974
  10. Lu YC, Wu MK, Zhang L, et al. Association between suicide risk and traumatic brain injury in adults: a population based cohort study. Postgrad Med J 2020;96(1142):747–752. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-136860
  11. Smith K, Mahr J. Violent crime rate doubles on CTA rail system, even with stepped-up police efforts and far fewer riders: ‘The people that are driving the crime never left the system.’ Chicagotribune.Com; 2020. Available from: https://www.chicagotribune.com/investigations/ct-chicago-crime-cta-train-stations-20201214-el4tvqdanzb5jbgwlkecyx27kq-htmlstory.html
  12. Silla A, Luoma J. Main characteristics of train-pedestrian fatalities on Finnish railroads. Accid Anal Prev 2012;45:61–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.008
  13. Kilbourne AM, Beck K, Spaeth-Rublee B, et al. Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective. World Psychiatry 2018;17(1):30–38. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20482
  14. Shapiro MJ, Luchtefeld WB, Durham RM, et al. Traumatic train injuries. Am J Emerg Med 1994;12(1):92–93. DOI: 10.1016/0735-6757(94)90210-0
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.