Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2023 ) > List of Articles


Diagnostic Accuracy of the Extended FAST Protocol Performed by Students and Surgical Residents in the Emergency Department in 2022

Edward Delgado, Daiana López, Manuela Arocena, Nicolás A Consolandich, Nicolás Sagasti, Fernando Machado

Keywords : Emergency, Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma, Injured, Polytraumatized

Citation Information : Delgado E, López D, Arocena M, Consolandich NA, Sagasti N, Machado F. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Extended FAST Protocol Performed by Students and Surgical Residents in the Emergency Department in 2022. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2023; 12 (2):80-85.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1423

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 19-08-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Introduction: The Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (eFAST) protocol is an evaluation system that consists of ultrasonographic determination of intraabdominal free fluid, hemothorax, and pneumothorax. So far, there is no national research on this subject; in this context, the present study is proposed. Objectives: The general objective was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of the eFAST protocol performed by previously trained students and surgical residents in an emergency department. The obtained diagnosis was then compared to the intraoperative diagnosis, computed tomography (CT), or ultrasound. Methodology: A prospective, descriptive, observational study of diagnostic tests was performed. This study included patients who suffered a traumatic event involving kinetic energy transmission between January and September of 2022 and who were also submitted to an eFAST protocol in the Emergency Department of the Hospital de Clínicas in Montevideo, Uruguay. Results: Out of 100 eFAST protocols, 28 were performed by students and 72 by residents. No significant differences (p = 0.59) were found between operators. Of the 100 eFAST protocols, 69 were negative and 31 were positive (pneumothorax being the main diagnosis). CT was the most common comparison method (87%). This study met 70% sensitivity, 95% specificity, and 90% positive predictive value. The most frequent etiology was polytrauma (56%). Conclusion: The eFAST protocol performed by surgical residents and undergraduate students presented high specificity and high positive predictive value, with no significant differences between both groups. Clinical significance: This protocol has proven to be a valuable tool in the emergency department to improve patient prognosis. This is the first research to determine the diagnostic accuracy of said protocol at the national level, and the first to compare its precision between general surgery residents and previously trained advanced medical students.

  1. Pontet J, Yic C, Díaz-Gómez J, et al. Ultrasonografía en Urgencias, Cuidados Intensivos y Anestesiología. In: Ultrasonografía en Urgencias, Cuidados Intensivos y Anestesiología. Montevideo: Editorial Cuadrado; 2016. p. 212–20.
  2. Rozycki G, Ochsner M, Schmidt J, et al. A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. J Trauma 1995;39(3):492–500. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199509000-00016
  3. The ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma, International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS®): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74(5):1363–1366. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b82f5
  4. Sztajnkrycer MD, Baez AA, Luke A. Fast ultrasound as an adjunct to triage using the START mass casualty triage system: a preliminary descriptive study. Prehosp Emerg Care 2006;10(1):96–102. DOI: 10.1080/10903120500373058
  5. O Víctor Dinamarca. Ecografía abdominal dedicada al trauma (FAST). Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes 2013;24(1):63–67. DOI: 10.1016/S0716-8640(13)70130-5
  6. Bloom B, Ribbons R. Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma. Treasure Island; 2022 May. Disponible en:
  7. Giraldo-Restrepo JA, Serna-Jiménez TJ. Examen FAST y FAST extendido. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2014;43(4):299–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.rca.2015.03.010
  8. Netherton S, Milenkovic V, Taylor M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of eFAST in the trauma patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Canad J Emerg Med 2019;21(6):727–738. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2019.381
  9. Staub LJ, Biscaro RRM, Kaszubowski E, et al. Chest ultrasonography for the emergency diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax and haemothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 2018;49(3):457–466. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.033
  10. Ollerton JE, Sugrue M, Balogh Z, et al. Prospective study to evaluate the influence of FAST on trauma patient management. J Trauma 2006;60(4):785–791. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000214583.21492.e8
  11. Thippeswamy PB, Rajasekaran RB. Imaging in polytrauma – principles and current concepts. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2020;16:106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.006
  12. Baker S. The Injury Fact Book. Second. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. 22–30 p.
  13. Marsden NJ, Tuma F. Polytraumatized Patient. 2021. Disponible en:,include%20suicide%20and%20homicide%20attempts
  14. Presidencia de la República, Unidad Nacional de Seguridad Vial. Primer Informe de Gestión y Estadística de Seguridad Vial Presidencia de la República. 2020.
  15. Anamaría Pacheco F. Trauma de abdomen. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes 2011;22(5):623–630. DOI: 10.1016/S0716-8640(11)70474-6
  16. Lotfollahzadeh S, Burns B. Penetrating Abdominal Trauma. StatPearls. 2022. Disponible en:,with%20penetrating%20abdominal%20has%20changed
  17. Machado F. Relato oficial del 60° Congreso Uruguayo de Cirugía. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Cirugía, editor. Trauma de Abdomen. Montevideo; 2009.
  18. Jehle D, Heller M. The FAST Exam: a review of the literature. In: Ultrasonography in Trauma: The Fast Exam. Dallas: American College of Physicians; 2003. p. 127–45.
  19. Brooks A, Davies B, Smethhurst M, et al. Emergency ultrasound in the acute assessment of haemothorax. J Emerg Med 2004;21(1):44–46. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2003.005438
  20. Tsui CL, Fung HT, Chung KL, et al. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma in the emergency department for blunt abdominal trauma. Int J Emerg Med 2008;1(3):183–187. DOI: 10.1007/s12245-008-0050-2
  21. Hoffmann R, Nerlich M, Muggia-Sullam M, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma in cases of multiple trauma evaluated by ultrasonography: a prospective analysis of 291 patients. J Trauma 1992;32(4):452–458. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199204000-00008
  22. Lee BC, Ormsby EL, McGahan JP, et al. The utility of sonography for the triage of blunt abdominal trauma patients to exploratory laparotomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(2):415–421. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.2100
  23. Quinn AC, Sinert R. What is the utility of the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam in penetrating torso trauma? Injury 2011;42(5):482–487. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.07.249
  24. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Rademacher G, et al. Association between compliance with methodological standards of diagnostic research and reported test accuracy: meta-analysis of focused assessment of US for trauma. Radiology 2005;236(1):102–111. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361040791
  25. Pedri L, Daniel M, Cláudio L, et al. Estudo Comparativo do FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) Realizado por Médico Residente de Cirurgia Geral e Médico Radiologista 2015;41(2):39–47.
  26. Silva W, Ocampo C, Zandalazini H, et al. Ecografía en el traumatismo toracoabdominal cerrado: resultados en un programa de residencia quirúrgica. Revista Argentina de Cirugía 2004;86(3/4):118–129.
  27. Kendall JL, Ramos JP. Fluid-filled bowel mimicking hemoperitoneum: a false-positive finding during sonographic evaluation for trauma. J Emerg Med 2003;25(1):79–82. DOI: 10.1016/s0736-4679(03)00128-8
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.