Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery

Register      Login

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 2 ( May-August, 2024 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Mechanical Ventilation Weaning in a Third level Center in Latin America

David J Sánchez-Amaya, Luis B Godínez-Córdova, Lucy V Amaya-Ortiz, Oscar E Sánchez-Sura, César A Ramos-Matamoros, Nancy G Rodríguez-Murillo, Daniel E Sandoval-Colin, Henry Osorto, Manfredy Moncada-Navas

Keywords : Extubation, Mechanical ventilation in Latin America, Spontaneous Breathing Trial, Weaning

Citation Information : Sánchez-Amaya DJ, Godínez-Córdova LB, Amaya-Ortiz LV, Sánchez-Sura OE, Ramos-Matamoros CA, Rodríguez-Murillo NG, Sandoval-Colin DE, Osorto H, Moncada-Navas M. Mechanical Ventilation Weaning in a Third level Center in Latin America. Panam J Trauma Crit Care Emerg Surg 2024; 13 (2):74-81.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1456

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-08-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is not free of complications; therefore, patients must be weaned off whenever possible. This study aimed to characterize the MV weaning process in an intensive care unit (ICU) in Latin America. Materials and methods: A transversal, analytic, single-center, descriptive study was conducted over 4 months, in mechanically ventilated patients who were eventually extubated. The primary outcome was to determine extubation failure (EF) after MV cessation, with any of the following extubation methods: after spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) performance, planned extubation without SBT, fortuitous extubation, or tracheostomy. Secondary outcomes included the exploration of the effects of extubation methods on days of MV, in-hospital mortality, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and number of intubations. Results: Data from 52 patients were collected. The median age was 41 years, 48% being women. Most patients were on MV due to respiratory conditions (22, 42.3%). MV median time was 3 days [interquartile range (IQR) 2.0–7.2], p = 0.8. The most common method for MV withdrawing was planned extubation, n = 32 (61%). Approximately, 40% of patients died, and performing SBT did not reduce the risk of EF, nor in-hospital mortality risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.41, 0.18–1.60, 95%, confidence interval (CI) p = 0.224]. Similarly, no difference was found in VAP occurrence according to the extubation method (p > 0.9). However, a trend for reduced mortality was observed in patients with two intubations and SBT (OR 7.13, 1.15–73.79, 95%, CI p = 0.053). Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in relationship to days on MV, VAP, or in-hospital mortality whether extubation was preceded by SBT or not. Further research is warranted to explore the factors influencing the weaning process and to validate the findings in larger and more diverse patient populations.


PDF Share
  1. Boles JM, Bion J, Connors A, et al. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Eur Respir J 2007;29:1033–1056. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00010206
  2. McConville JF, Kress JP. Weaning patients from the ventilator. N Engl J Med 2012;367(23):2233–2239. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1203367
  3. Bendixen HH, Egbert LD, Hedley-Whyte J. Respiratory care, 1st edition. St Louis; 1965. pp. 149–150.
  4. Stawicki S. Mechanical ventilation: weaning and extubation. Int J Acad Med 2017;3(3):67. DOI: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_87_16
  5. Subirà C, Hernández G, Vázquez A, et al. Effect of pressure support vs T-piece ventilation strategies during spontaneous breathing trials on successful extubation among patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019;321(22):2175–2182. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.7234
  6. Glover S, Glossop A. Managing extubation and the post-extubation period in the intensive care unit. EMJ 2017. DOI: 10.33590/emjrespir/10313378
  7. Cumpstey A, Benzie SJ, McKechnie S. Tracheostomy management. BMJ 2012;16;e6016. DOI: 10.1136/sbmj.e6016
  8. Urner M, Jüni P, Hansen B, et al. Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8(9):905–913. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30325-8
  9. Walker G. Care Management Dashboards: Calculation of Risk Scores Charlson Comorbity Index.
  10. Martins Queiroz Guimarães M DE, Rodolfo Rocco J. Prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a university hospital and prognosis for the patients affected. J Bras Pneumol 2006;32:339.
  11. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Muriel A, et al. Evolution of mortality over time in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188(2):220–230. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201212-2169OC
  12. Lone NI, Walsh TS. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: Epidemiology, outcomes and modelling the potential cost consequences of establishing a regional weaning unit. Crit Care 2011;15(2):R102. DOI: 10.1186/cc10117
  13. Nassar Y, Magdy M, Hamed L, et al. A 5-year registry of mechanically ventilated patients comprising epidemiology, initial settings, and clinical outcome. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc 2018;67(3):250. DOI: 10.4103/ejcdt.ejcdt_34_18
  14. Sosa-Medellín MA, Marín-Romero MC. Extubación fallida en una unidad de cuidados intensivos de la Ciudad de México. Med Int Méx 2017;4:459–465.
  15. Wunsch H, Linde-Zwirble WT, Angus DC, et al. The epidemiology of mechanical ventilation use in the United States. Crit Care Med 2010;38(10):1947–1953. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181ef4460
  16. Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 2002;287(3):345–355. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.3.345
  17. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries JAMA 2016;315(8):788–800. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291
  18. Epstein S. Decision to extubate. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:535–546. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1268-8
  19. Torrini F, Gendreau S, Morel J, et al. Prediction of extubation outcome in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2021;25(1). DOI: 10.1186/s13054-021-03802-3
  20. Durbin CG Jr. Tracheostomy: why, when, and how? Respir Care 2010;55(8):1058–1068.
  21. Löfroth M, Petersson JE, Uusijärvi J, et al. Outcomes of prolonged intensive care and rehabilitation at a specialized multidisciplinary center in Sweden. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2022;66(2):232–239. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13998
  22. Ali Munive A, Varon Vega FA, Hernandez Parra A, et al. Epidemiology, clinical differences and outcomes of tracheobronchitis and pneumonia associated to mechanical ventilation in intensive care units of Latin America (LatinNAVE). Intensive Care Med Exp 2015;3(Suppl 1):A703. DOI: 10.1186/2197-425X-3-S1-A703
  23. Kim EK, Kwon YD, Hwang JH. Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II. J Prev Med Public Health 2005;38(3):276–282.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.